Smithsonian Institution Archives
  • Collections
  • Services
  • Smithsonian History
  • About
  • Education
  • Blog
  • Forums
  • Press
  • Audiences
  • Donate

The Bigger Picture: Visual Archives and the Smithsonian

Pickering’s Women?

by Catherine Shteynberg on May 8, 2009

Annie Jump Cannon (1863-1941), sitting at desk, Unidentified Photographer, early- to mid-20th century, Smithsonian Institution Archives While browsing through our photographs, I found a serendipitous connection between our recent Women in Science portraits and our present focus on astronomy and photography. Annie Jump Cannon, one of the women featured in that set, began her tenure at Harvard College Observatory as one of the many female "computers" under Observatory director, Edward Pickering. These computers, sometimes called "Pickering’s Women," were hired to do the tedious scanning and measuring of astronomical photographic plates and the resulting calculations on the positions and brightness of stars. Pickering could hire female computers as unpaid volunteers or for a fraction of the price of men, and he observed that the women he hired (including his housekeeper) were actually more capable of the laborious and detail-oriented work than many of the male scientists. Most women during this time period didn’t have university-level science educations and so they tended to be able to contribute the most in data-gathering and sciences that didn’t require specific educational training, such as botany and astronomy. In particular, the shift in the late-19th and early-20th centuries from observational astronomy to the new field of photographic astrophysics allowed women to become some of the most important astronomers of their time. Henrietta Swan Leavitt, Unknown Photographer, Date Unknown, credit of AIP Emilio Segre Visual Archives Annie Jump Cannon systematically categorized the hundreds of thousands of stars shown on the photo plates taken at the Observatory to create her own special classification system, which is still in use today. Cannon’s colleague, Henrietta Leavitt, devised a theory that helped to discovered the period-luminosity law for Cepheids, on which basis astronomers still measure the size of the cosmos, and discovered 2,400 variable stars—about half of the total number of variable stars known at that time! Though they received almost no recognition during their lifetime, "Pickering’s Women" succeeded in far surpassing most of their male counterparts in their discoveries through astronomy and photography. As Bill Bryson notes in his book, A Short History of Nearly Everything: "(Just to put these insights into perspective, it is perhaps worth noting that at the time Leavitt and Cannon were inferring fundamental properties of the cosmos from dim smudges on photographic plates, the Harvard astronomer William H. Pickering*, who could of course peer into a first-class telescope as often as he wanted, was developing his seminal theory that dark patches on the Moon were caused by swarms of seasonally migrating insects.)" For more information and references, see Science in the early twentieth century: An Encyclopedia (pg. 249), by Jacob Darwin Hamblin.

 

Astronomical "calculators" at Harvard. Group includes Henrietta Swan Leavitt and Annie Jump Cannon [the two women with black dots under them], Unknown Photographer, Unknown Date, Harvard College Observatory, courtesy AIP Emilio Segre Visual Archives*William was the younger brother of Edward Pickering, the Harvard Observatory director.

Categories: Collections in Focus
Tags: American History, Science
Comments: View 9 comments, or Give us yours!
All comments are moderated and subject to approval. Further information is available in The Bigger Picture’s Commenting Guidelines.

Comments (9) – Leave a comment

Penny

Also note that Cannon and Leavitt were both deaf from early adulthood: http://disstud.blogspot.com/2006/12/december-11-annie-jump-cannon-1863.html

Penny May 9, 2009 at 5:08 am
  • reply
Catherine Shteynberg, Smithsonian Photography Initiative

Thank you Penny for the great link! I know that a couple of books mention that Leavitt was very inspired by Cannon's work and success despite her disability. And though Leavitt was seriously considered for the Nobel prize and then didn't receive it, her name was given to a crater on the Moon in honor of her own discoveries and in honor of deaf men and women who made significant contributions to science.

Catherine Shteynberg, Smithsonian Photography Initiative May 11, 2009 at 9:51 am
  • reply
Kirit Sheth

Does anyone know the highest number of women 'computers' hired at any given time by the Harvard Observatory during Pickering's directorship ?

Kirit Sheth July 6, 2009 at 4:57 am
  • reply
Catherine Shteynberg, Smithsonian Photography Initiative

Hi Kirit- The Observatory officially started hiring women in 1875. While I'm not sure of the highest number of women "computers" working at one time, the hiring of women picked up in the 1880s under Pickering's administration, and during his tenure (1880-1919) forty women worked in the Observatory. Anyone else have specific numbers?

Catherine Shteynberg, Smithsonian Photography Initiative July 6, 2009 at 12:13 pm
  • reply
Clyde Spadafore

Wow! You really covered this topic well. Are there other resources that I should check out?

Clyde Spadafore December 20, 2009 at 3:18 am
  • reply
John Maloney

Great post! I was really impressed by the quality of the resources. Thank you alot.

John Maloney February 11, 2010 at 10:14 pm
  • reply
Alejandro Clocchiatti

The article states "...Henrietta Leavitt, devised a theory that helped to..." This is wrong. What Henrietta Leavitt made was a "discovery," not a "theory." Hers was an impressive observational result that correlated an observable which is a proxi for a combination of the distance and intrinsic brightness towards a particular type of variable star (the aparent magnitude), with another observable which is a proxi for the intrinsic brightness (the period of variability). Out of the two you get the distance to the star. Distances are very, very, very valuable in astronomy, and Leavitt realization is still the basis for one of the most precise techniques available. It was a bright analytical insight after the mind numbing inspection of, very probably, thousands of stellar images. It was something much tougher to come up with, and by far much more solid, than a "theory."

Alejandro Clocchiatti April 17, 2012 at 6:22 pm
  • reply
Catherine Shteynberg

Alejandro--thank you so much for the correction! You will see that I struck through the old text above and have noted that Leavitt discovered the period-luminosity law for Cepheids and have added a citation link. Such is the problem with a non-science person such as myself writing about the complex issues of astronomy.

It's pretty amazing that Leavitt's technique is still one of the most precise available. Despite my own ignorance about the precise nature of her incredible discovery (which as you note, "is by far much more solid, than a 'theory'"), I had no intention of downplaying her work, and I remain in awe of her intelligence and ability to overcome the very challenging work environment of women (especially women astronomers) of her time.

Best,
Catherine

Catherine Shteynberg April 19, 2012 at 12:01 pm
  • reply
Cassandra JB Polemi

Thank you ALL for honoring my Great Aunt, Henrietta Swan Leavitt!
I so wish i could have met her. My dad, Roswell Fiske Brown, talked about her often.
The family was a family of few words.
As to how many star counters, i believe there were 8. They were called "computers".
If any of you has knowledge of good images of her, please let me know. I have several but
only recently came across the one of them hand in hand in front of Harvard i believe.
I would love a good image of that one!!
It appears to me that she is the one in the black skirt.
Thanks!
Cassandra

Cassandra JB Polemi January 27, 2013 at 6:12 pm
  • reply

Leave a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Produced by the Smithsonian Institution Archives. For copyright questions, please see the Terms of Use.

Stay in touch!

Facebook Twitter Flickr YouTube SlideShare
Join our eNewsletter

About

Connecting you to America’s past with a behind-the-scenes exploration of the Smithsonian’s history, treasures, and the challenges that Archives face preserving collections. More details...

Smithsonian on Flickr Commons

Topics/Tags

  • See Here (611)
  • American History (542)
  • Science (429)
  • Archive (329)
  • Cities/Places (277)
  • Exhibitions (234)
  • Web/Tech (210)
  • Photo History (189)
  • Link Love (153)
  • Politics/Government (153)

Blog Roll

All Smithsonian blogs
American Historical Association Blog
American Institute of Conservation Blog
Archives Next
Archives of American Art
Around the Mall
Field Book Project
Hanging Together
Library of Congress Blogs
National Archives (US) Blogs
National Museum of American History, O say can you see?
Smithsonian Collections Blog
Smithsonian Libraries
Teaching American History

Categories

  • Collections in Focus (988)
  • What Gets Saved (337)
  • Behind the Scenes (212)
  • Smithsonian History (134)

Recent Posts

  • See Here: 5/17/2013
  • Link Love: 5/17/2013
  • Weird and Wonderful: The Surprising Mrs. Hilda Hempl Heller
  • Women in Science Wednesday: Anne Hagopian
  • Sneak Peek 5/15/2013

Monthly Archive

  • May 2013 (20)
  • April 2013 (26)
  • March 2013 (26)
  • February 2013 (26)
  • January 2013 (28)
  • December 2012 (26)
  • November 2012 (28)
  • October 2012 (32)
  • September 2012 (26)
  • August 2012 (31)
  • July 2012 (26)
  • June 2012 (27)
  • May 2012 (27)
  • April 2012 (27)
  • March 2012 (28)
  • February 2012 (27)
  • January 2012 (26)
  • December 2011 (31)
  • November 2011 (28)
  • October 2011 (35)
  • September 2011 (31)
  • August 2011 (35)
  • July 2011 (41)
  • June 2011 (43)
  • May 2011 (33)
  • April 2011 (40)
  • March 2011 (43)
  • February 2011 (35)
  • January 2011 (36)
  • December 2010 (42)
  • November 2010 (40)
  • October 2010 (44)
  • September 2010 (37)
  • August 2010 (39)
  • July 2010 (38)
  • June 2010 (37)
  • May 2010 (42)
  • April 2010 (44)
  • March 2010 (47)
  • February 2010 (40)
  • January 2010 (39)
  • December 2009 (43)
  • November 2009 (34)
  • October 2009 (11)
  • September 2009 (11)
  • August 2009 (12)
  • July 2009 (14)
  • June 2009 (10)
  • May 2009 (12)
  • April 2009 (14)
  • March 2009 (10)
  • January 2009 (1)
Smithsonian Institution Archives
eNewsletter Facebook Twitter Flickr Historypin YouTube SlideShare Browsealoud
Smithsonian Institution
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Contact