Margaret DONG, Plaintiff, vs. SMITHSONIAN INISTITUTION, Defendant
Close
PrintEmployee brought action against the Smithsonian alleging violation of Privacy Act. Court ruled that the Smithsonian as a federal agency was subject to the Privacy Act, which it willfully and intentionally violated. Court compensated employee $2,500 in damages to her reputation.
Smithsonian Legal Documents
See, Cotton v. Adams, 798 F.Supp. 22 (D.D.C.1992); See, Dong v. Smithsonian Institution, 878 F.Supp. 244 (D.D.C.1995); See, Cotton v. Heyman, 63 F.3d 1115, 1119 at note 2 (D.C.Cir.1995)
943 Federal Supplement (Book)
Institutional History Division, Smithsonian Institution Archives, 600 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20024-2520, SIHistory@si.edu
Court case
Number of pages: 5; Page Numbers: 69-75