The Bigger Picture: Visual Archives and the Smithsonian
Who Wears Short Shorts?
Back in 1958, The Royal Teens, a New Jersey singing group, scored a top ten hit with “Short Shorts.” You can see what the commotion was about on YouTube.
And it turns out that short shorts, as seen in photographs, still attract attention. The blogosphere was all abuzz last week, following the appearance of photograph on Newsweek’s November 23rd cover, featuring Sarah Palin in running shorts. Why did Newsweek run and repurpose the photo, originally shot by photographer Brian Adams for a Runner’s World magazine article, "I’m a Runner"? Was it a sexist thing to do, as Taylor Marsh contends in a Huffington Post blogpost? Was it newsstand-sales-boosting tactic for a magazine trying to grab the spotlight? Was the selection of the image ideologically driven, a not-so-oblique comment on what a controversial national figure is doing for attention? Or is it just one more example of the way images that feature celebrity skin (or flesh in general) generate a Pavlovian response?
One thing’s for sure, this seems like it’s getting to be a trend. Remember the pictures and flap this past August when Michelle Obama wore shorts on a trip to the Grand Canyon? Remember the he-manly and shirtless photographs that Vladmir Putin released to the media, also in August? And what about the widely reproduced paparazzi photos of Barack Obama’s presidential abs? Is this all just an image-world’s way of updating of The Emperor’s New Clothes? Is featuring images of world leaders minus their shirts and/or pants on a way to make them look, as US Magazine puts it, “just like us?” Either way, photography proves itself essential, once again, in building and knocking images.
Comments (2) – Leave a comment
It's interesting that such an innocuous item of clothing should be the cause of intense debate! I love the image which is illustrating the post - you very rarely see images like this any more, where the juxtaposition between 'normality' and 'bizarre' seems so normal. I suppose it was the 40's, so guys doing exercises using bombs was just normal..
Shorts are innocuous in pictures, my guess is, until they threaten to void or contradict the image of "authority" that some people work so hard to project and or think it's essential to maintain. And on that shorts/bomb picture, it's so loaded with possible readings it's a gift that keeps on giving.
Leave a comment
Produced by the Smithsonian Institution Archives. For copyright questions, please see the Terms of Use.
About
Smithsonian on Flickr Commons
Topics/Tags
- See Here (480)
- American History (431)
- Science (337)
- Cities/Places (222)
- Archive (213)
- Exhibitions (188)
- Web/Tech (160)
- Photo History (148)
- World History (129)
- Politics/Government (128)
Blog Roll
Categories
- Collections in Focus (743)
- What Gets Saved (252)
- Behind the Scenes (168)
- Smithsonian History (84)
Monthly Archive
- February 2012 (8)
- January 2012 (26)
- December 2011 (31)
- November 2011 (28)
- October 2011 (35)
- September 2011 (31)
- August 2011 (35)
- July 2011 (41)
- June 2011 (43)
- May 2011 (33)
- April 2011 (40)
- March 2011 (43)
- February 2011 (35)
- January 2011 (36)
- December 2010 (42)
- November 2010 (40)
- October 2010 (44)
- September 2010 (37)
- August 2010 (39)
- July 2010 (38)
- June 2010 (37)
- May 2010 (42)
- April 2010 (44)
- March 2010 (47)
- February 2010 (40)
- January 2010 (39)
- December 2009 (43)
- November 2009 (34)
- October 2009 (11)
- September 2009 (11)
- August 2009 (12)
- July 2009 (14)
- June 2009 (10)
- May 2009 (12)
- April 2009 (14)
- March 2009 (10)
- January 2009 (1)