The Bigger Picture: Visual Archives and the Smithsonian
New Identification of Scopes Trial Photos—Thanks to You!
A few weeks ago, during the anniversary of the famous “Scopes Monkey” Trial of 1925, we asked you to help us identify some photographs in our Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes set on the Smithsonian Flickr Commons.
Some were skeptical that we’d get any new information. For example, in an article over at the Times Free Press of Chattanooga, TN, Tom Davis, a former director of the yearly Scopes Trial Festival, said: “I think it’s a great idea. It’s one of these things that, who knows? Maybe somebody’s grandson or granddaughter would recognize them…But 80 some years after the fact, you’re really at a dead end otherwise.”
Well, wouldn’t you know, that is exactly what happened! We’ve often admired this beautiful young lady in the Scopes set, but no one knew who she was. Within days of putting the call out for the public’s help in crowdsourcing the identification of images, we heard from this woman’s daughter and granddaughter, who let us know that she was Andrewena Robinson Davis. Ms. Davis was the daughter of F. E. (Frank Earle) Robinson, a member of the Rhea County Board of Education. It was in Mr. Robinson’s drugstore where local business leaders persuaded schoolteacher John Thomas Scopes to consent to be charged with violating state law by teaching about evolution.
In addition, Mr. Robinson’s granddaughter, Ann Gabbert Bates, let us know that her grandfather—who’d we’d mistakenly identified as Fred E. Robinson, in a caption on the Flickr Commons—was in fact named F. E. (Frank Earle) Robinson. F.E. Robinson, known as “the Hustling Druggist” during the trial, was known primarily by his initials. Fred Robinson was the owner of Robinson Manufacturing Company located in Dayton, Tennessee. The Archives staff knew that F.E. Robinson was Frank and not Fred, but had simply written the caption incorrectly. But what a difference our misspelling made! As any researcher knows, a misspelling can drastically change the course of one’s research. And as Marcel Chotowski LaFollette, the historian and discoverer of many of our Scopes Trial photos at the Archives, noted, when you search online for the phrase fred robinson scopes, there are plenty of legitimate sources that misspell Frank Earle Robinson’s name. Marcel questioned, “So how long will the wrong name remain misused now that things float electronically through time for so long?” For us, it’s a reminder of, as Marcel puts it, “the importance of getting it right in a digital age.”
In other words, a huge thank you goes out to Ms. Bates and her daughter for helping us identify and rectify our records at the Archives! We’re thrilled to know, as has been proven many times when we’ve asked for your help, that crowdsourcing our questions through social media is an excellent way for us to learn more about our collections.
And for any of the rest of you, hungry to solve more photo mysteries, check out the remaining unidentified photographs in the Scopes Trial set, and let us know if you have any insights!
Comments (3) – Leave a comment
Hi Josh- I'm very sorry that your comments have been spammed. Sometimes that is out of our control as websites with commercial affiliations automatically are put in a spam folder by our anti-spam software--I just happened to see it in our spam folder today. With thousands of spammers filling up our blog each day, it's easy to miss comments like yours amongst them. I hope that you will continue to read and comment on The Bigger Picture. Just so you (and other readers) are aware of our commenting policy, you do need to use your real name (as you have above) and not the name of a commercial website, in order to get a comment approved (you can read the rest of the commenting guidelines here if you're interested: /about/). Otherwise, we both encourage and enjoy your comments! Thanks for being persistent! Best, Catherine Smithsonian Institution Archives
These 1925 Photos are great.. Thanks for sharing this with us
Why don't you post my comments? I enjoy this site and have made several intelligent comments lately yet you do not post them. Is it because I use a keyword in the anchor text? I have seen others do this like "Maine Photo" so I thought it okay. But then I tried simply using my first name and my comments were still censored. Are only employees allowed to comment? Why are you biased? I am not spamming. Please respond via email or something, because this is very frustrating.
Leave a comment
Produced by the Smithsonian Institution Archives. For copyright questions, please see the Terms of Use.
About
Smithsonian on Flickr Commons
Topics/Tags
- See Here (611)
- American History (542)
- Science (430)
- Archive (330)
- Cities/Places (278)
- Exhibitions (234)
- Web/Tech (210)
- Photo History (189)
- Link Love (153)
- Politics/Government (153)
Blog Roll
Categories
- Collections in Focus (990)
- What Gets Saved (337)
- Behind the Scenes (212)
- Smithsonian History (135)
Monthly Archive
- May 2013 (23)
- April 2013 (26)
- March 2013 (26)
- February 2013 (26)
- January 2013 (28)
- December 2012 (26)
- November 2012 (28)
- October 2012 (32)
- September 2012 (26)
- August 2012 (31)
- July 2012 (26)
- June 2012 (27)
- May 2012 (27)
- April 2012 (27)
- March 2012 (28)
- February 2012 (27)
- January 2012 (26)
- December 2011 (31)
- November 2011 (28)
- October 2011 (35)
- September 2011 (31)
- August 2011 (35)
- July 2011 (41)
- June 2011 (43)
- May 2011 (33)
- April 2011 (40)
- March 2011 (43)
- February 2011 (35)
- January 2011 (36)
- December 2010 (42)
- November 2010 (40)
- October 2010 (44)
- September 2010 (37)
- August 2010 (39)
- July 2010 (38)
- June 2010 (37)
- May 2010 (42)
- April 2010 (44)
- March 2010 (47)
- February 2010 (40)
- January 2010 (39)
- December 2009 (43)
- November 2009 (34)
- October 2009 (11)
- September 2009 (11)
- August 2009 (12)
- July 2009 (14)
- June 2009 (10)
- May 2009 (12)
- April 2009 (14)
- March 2009 (10)
- January 2009 (1)




