The Bigger Picture: Visual Archives and the Smithsonian
Memories are Made of This
For all that’s been said about the form and content of photographic images, few of us are aware of how the ways we actually see, process, and remember photos helps to explain their power over us. Say what you will about the skills or “vision” of gifted picture-makers, but early on in the process of working on click! photography changes everything, I began to wonder if there weren’t some physiological and neurological reasons that could more objectively explain why photographs evoke such immediate and powerful responses from us. So, I decided to try to seek out researchers who might be able to shed some light on what happens when we look at an image. How we, literally, perceive, access and remember the information in the photographic images that we see.
Perhaps naively, I called a “brain institute” at a local university, explained what I was up to, and inquired if there was someone around who might help me test out my vague ideas about photography and perception. To my surprise, the person who answered the phone said, “Wait, here’s a scientist,” and passed the receiver over to someone who, from the sound of things, happened to be walking by when my call came in. I explained what we, at the Smithsonian Photography Initiative, were up to, and posed the first question that popped into my mind: “Is there a difference between what we see when we look at a photograph of something, as opposed to looking directly at the thing, itself?” The response I got—one I’ve heard a number of times, as we reached out to potential contributors for click!, who we invited them to think about photographic images from new perspectives—was, “Nobody’s every asked me that question before.”
Realizing that what I was asking was probably too broad and philosophically fraught, I spent some time coming up with more specific queries before I started the next round of cold calls to more targeted researchers in the field. Luckily, one of the first people I spoke with was Jeremy Wolfe—director of the Visual Attention Lab at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, and a professor of Ophthalmology at Harvard University—who immediately got what I was after and generously explained some aspects of the work he and some of his colleagues were up to. For click!, Wolfe has written a story that describes how quickly and emphatically photographic images imprint themselves as, and in memory. The experiment he presents to illustrate the point is as startling as it is simple. See for yourself. Click here…
Leave a comment
Produced by the Smithsonian Institution Archives. For copyright questions, please see the Terms of Use.
About
Smithsonian on Flickr Commons
Topics/Tags
- See Here (611)
- American History (542)
- Science (429)
- Archive (329)
- Cities/Places (277)
- Exhibitions (234)
- Web/Tech (210)
- Photo History (189)
- Link Love (153)
- Politics/Government (153)
Blog Roll
Categories
- Collections in Focus (989)
- What Gets Saved (337)
- Behind the Scenes (212)
- Smithsonian History (134)
Monthly Archive
- May 2013 (21)
- April 2013 (26)
- March 2013 (26)
- February 2013 (26)
- January 2013 (28)
- December 2012 (26)
- November 2012 (28)
- October 2012 (32)
- September 2012 (26)
- August 2012 (31)
- July 2012 (26)
- June 2012 (27)
- May 2012 (27)
- April 2012 (27)
- March 2012 (28)
- February 2012 (27)
- January 2012 (26)
- December 2011 (31)
- November 2011 (28)
- October 2011 (35)
- September 2011 (31)
- August 2011 (35)
- July 2011 (41)
- June 2011 (43)
- May 2011 (33)
- April 2011 (40)
- March 2011 (43)
- February 2011 (35)
- January 2011 (36)
- December 2010 (42)
- November 2010 (40)
- October 2010 (44)
- September 2010 (37)
- August 2010 (39)
- July 2010 (38)
- June 2010 (37)
- May 2010 (42)
- April 2010 (44)
- March 2010 (47)
- February 2010 (40)
- January 2010 (39)
- December 2009 (43)
- November 2009 (34)
- October 2009 (11)
- September 2009 (11)
- August 2009 (12)
- July 2009 (14)
- June 2009 (10)
- May 2009 (12)
- April 2009 (14)
- March 2009 (10)
- January 2009 (1)

