The Bigger Picture: Visual Archives and the Smithsonian
Love Thy Neighbor's Mug Shot
Given the trouble newspapers are having staying afloat—which includes paying for reporters, news gathering, and making (or leasing) photographs to illustrate stories—cutting costs is a key to survival. A startling article by Tim Badgett in the September 21st issue of Time magazine described how some papers are simultaneously trimming picture budgets and bulking up online readership by featuring digital, continually updated galleries of mug shots.
The home page of the St. Petersburg Times, for example, features mug shots of locals who’ve been arrested by the police in four nearby counties served by the paper. Straightforward, artless, and yet completely fascinating, the routine portraits depict subjects posed in front of neutral blue backgrounds. Although they’re all innocent until proven guilty, it’s hard not to scan faces for indicators of character and/or criminality. And for website visitors who want more specifics, a click or two links them directly to police records that provide names, addresses, vital statistics, and a sense of what these unintentional celebrities have been charged with.
Photography, since its invention, has been an essential tool for those charged with maintaining law and order. In the second half of the 19th century, Allan Pinkerton created a detective agency that published wanted posters and, later, books of mug shots that were distributed to clients, such as the American Bankers Association.
In the 1870s, Communards who manned barricades in the streets of Paris posed for the photographs that would ultimately be used to prosecute them. In the 20th century, tabloid newspapers routinely generated excitement by reproducing portraits of alleged and seasoned criminals, in order to both inform and titillate the reading public.
The phenomenon continues to this day. A quick online search yields a rogues gallery of historic and contemporary mug shots:


Mug shots, now a media staple; pique curiosity, build audiences, and cost nothing. That’s why, some have argued, news outlets’ websites feature these public domain pictures (under the Freedom of Information Act) so prominently and often. Take a look at one Florida TV channel’s website, to see hundreds of recent photographs, accompanied by an equally impressive array of graphs and statistics. “It’s a huge traffic driver for us,” Roger Simmons, digital news manager for the Orlando Sentinel, where mug shots generate 2.5 million page views per month, is quoted as saying in the Time article.
The more people who come to online sites to see both what’s going on and going wrong in the neighborhood, the higher the fees media sites can charge to advertisers can soar. Given that fact, the old adage—looking good is the best revenge—is starting to sound out-dated. Now, it’s the people charged with being bad and who’ve been photographed indifferently who are helping others laugh all the way to the bank.
Comments (6) – Leave a comment
Where's Sinatra's mugshot? That one is the grand duke of mugshots.
We so many celebrity snapshots out there, we couldn't show them all. So Google "Frank Sinatra mug shot" and you'll find 69,000+ opportunities to see it or references to it.
Marvin. It is a a bizarre and unfortunate development that Tim Badgert describes. In content and delivery, could the trend for artless, continually updated mug shot galleries create a bland middle-ground between Weegee and the Sex Offenders Registry; a continuous visual feed of society's bogey-men? Also, have you seen Least Wanted's collection? http://www.flickr.com/photos/leastwanted/sets/ Best, Pete
Pete; you're right, mug shots give the public a safe way to both revel in throw stones at presumed-innocent people who become society's bogeymen. Kind of like a media supported version of the Salem witch trials. Thanks for the link to the Flickr "Least Wanted" pictures. I was fascinated by one picture I saw, (http://www.flickr.com/photos/leastwanted/sets/72157603045005822/) taken by Fred McDarrah, a Village Voice photography, in 1964. It shows a bunch of Pop Artists, including Andy Warhol, Roy Lichtenstein, and James Rosenquist, standing in from of one of Warhol's paintings that were based on mug shots. Interesting, one of them--a 20x20 foot silkscreened mural of mugshots, commissioned to adorn the New York State pavillion designed by Phillip Johnson for the 1964-5 Worlds Fair--generated so much controversy that Warhol had his piece taken down and painted over.
Paris has the best mug shot by far but Bill gates, that thing is hilarious
Leave a comment
Produced by the Smithsonian Institution Archives. For copyright questions, please see the Terms of Use.
About
Smithsonian on Flickr Commons
Topics/Tags
- See Here (612)
- American History (544)
- Science (431)
- Archive (332)
- Cities/Places (279)
- Exhibitions (235)
- Web/Tech (211)
- Photo History (189)
- Link Love (154)
- Politics/Government (153)
Blog Roll
Categories
- Collections in Focus (991)
- What Gets Saved (338)
- Behind the Scenes (212)
- Smithsonian History (136)
Monthly Archive
- May 2013 (26)
- April 2013 (26)
- March 2013 (26)
- February 2013 (26)
- January 2013 (28)
- December 2012 (26)
- November 2012 (28)
- October 2012 (32)
- September 2012 (26)
- August 2012 (31)
- July 2012 (26)
- June 2012 (27)
- May 2012 (27)
- April 2012 (27)
- March 2012 (28)
- February 2012 (27)
- January 2012 (26)
- December 2011 (31)
- November 2011 (28)
- October 2011 (35)
- September 2011 (31)
- August 2011 (35)
- July 2011 (41)
- June 2011 (43)
- May 2011 (33)
- April 2011 (40)
- March 2011 (43)
- February 2011 (35)
- January 2011 (36)
- December 2010 (42)
- November 2010 (40)
- October 2010 (44)
- September 2010 (37)
- August 2010 (39)
- July 2010 (38)
- June 2010 (37)
- May 2010 (42)
- April 2010 (44)
- March 2010 (47)
- February 2010 (40)
- January 2010 (39)
- December 2009 (43)
- November 2009 (34)
- October 2009 (11)
- September 2009 (11)
- August 2009 (12)
- July 2009 (14)
- June 2009 (10)
- May 2009 (12)
- April 2009 (14)
- March 2009 (10)
- January 2009 (1)





