The Bigger Picture: Visual Archives and the Smithsonian
Look! Up in the Sky! It’s a Man! In a Raincoat!
Both the media and Times Square were aflutter recently over a photograph of President Obama used without permission on a huge two-sided billboard in midtown Manhattan to advertise men’s coats.
The photo, licensed from the Associated Press (AP) by the Weatherproof Garment Company, shows the President in front of the Great Wall on his recent trip to China. When Weatherproof’s president first saw the news photograph of America’s President wearing what he believed to be one of his products, he secured a hi-res version of the image and, aided by a magnifying glass, saw his company’s logo on the coat’s zipper pull. It didn’t take long before the an vinyl print of the image, a couple of stories tall, appeared with the tag-line “A Leader in Style” to promote what the company now calls “The Obama Jacket” on its website. The glamorous billboard certainly took New York pedestrians and the White House by surprise. The ad makes it seem as if President Obama is endorsing a product.
What happens next? As reported in the New York Times it’s expected that The White House will ask the cheeky manufacturer to take the billboard down. The AP, disclaiming responsibility for the image’s use, says licensing agreements require users to get appropriate clearances whenever necessary. But since the President is a public figure, some intellectual property lawyers are saying the issue of permission is murky.
For the moment, the picture’s triggering double-takes and causing a fuss. The street is full of people with still, cellphone, and video cameras taking pictures of a mundane picture that’s quickly becoming infamous. To learn more about the history of presidential photo-ops, read Kiku Adatto’s recent piece for click!. And while you’re at it, check out Amy Henderson’s click! piece about celebrity endorsements, glamour photography, and desire.
Comments (3) – Leave a comment
I would say that is a major advertising faux pas, but a very smart move nonetheless. Of course, they knew they couldn't use the photo. But who could have resisted the temptation?
You're right. I think the visibility and the controversy was all intensional and at the center of the use of the image. It was announced yesterday, by the way,that the billboard going to come down, but it hasn't yet. I'll keep walking by to see when and if that happens. The whole issue of photographic permissions is an interesting one. I'm fascinated, when I watch reality TV shows, how images of artworks, and of people on the street and in "public" places are increasingly being fuzzed out to avoid, I assume, dealing with permissions issues. I wonder if the White House press office is going to have to retouch every logo or identifying mark off the clothing or products the President uses, to avoid having something like this coat-controversy from happening again. And then, this garment-center inspired brouhaha raises another interesting quesitons about First Ladies' (and not just Michelle Obama's) relationships with fashion designers and if, how and why they're OK.
Leave a comment
Produced by the Smithsonian Institution Archives. For copyright questions, please see the Terms of Use.
About
Smithsonian on Flickr Commons
Topics/Tags
- See Here (611)
- American History (542)
- Science (430)
- Archive (330)
- Cities/Places (278)
- Exhibitions (234)
- Web/Tech (210)
- Photo History (189)
- Link Love (153)
- Politics/Government (153)
Blog Roll
Categories
- Collections in Focus (990)
- What Gets Saved (337)
- Behind the Scenes (212)
- Smithsonian History (135)
Monthly Archive
- May 2013 (23)
- April 2013 (26)
- March 2013 (26)
- February 2013 (26)
- January 2013 (28)
- December 2012 (26)
- November 2012 (28)
- October 2012 (32)
- September 2012 (26)
- August 2012 (31)
- July 2012 (26)
- June 2012 (27)
- May 2012 (27)
- April 2012 (27)
- March 2012 (28)
- February 2012 (27)
- January 2012 (26)
- December 2011 (31)
- November 2011 (28)
- October 2011 (35)
- September 2011 (31)
- August 2011 (35)
- July 2011 (41)
- June 2011 (43)
- May 2011 (33)
- April 2011 (40)
- March 2011 (43)
- February 2011 (35)
- January 2011 (36)
- December 2010 (42)
- November 2010 (40)
- October 2010 (44)
- September 2010 (37)
- August 2010 (39)
- July 2010 (38)
- June 2010 (37)
- May 2010 (42)
- April 2010 (44)
- March 2010 (47)
- February 2010 (40)
- January 2010 (39)
- December 2009 (43)
- November 2009 (34)
- October 2009 (11)
- September 2009 (11)
- August 2009 (12)
- July 2009 (14)
- June 2009 (10)
- May 2009 (12)
- April 2009 (14)
- March 2009 (10)
- January 2009 (1)


