Smithsonian Institution Archives
  • Collections
  • Services
  • Smithsonian History
  • About
  • Education
  • Blog
  • Forums
  • Press
  • Audiences
  • Donate

The Bigger Picture: Visual Archives and the Smithsonian

Gone, But Not Forgotten

by Marvin Heiferman on June 30, 2009

Outdated kodachrome '73, '79, '83, by Goodimages.

Recently, Kodak announced it was discontinuing production of Kodachrome products. Known for its vibrant color, Kodachrome, was a child of the Depression, a process invented by two musicians—violinist Leopold Godowski Jr. and pianist Leopold Mannes—whose names fueled the photo-industry joke that Kodachrome was created by God and Man.

Seventy-four years ago, Kodachrome was introduced as a 16mm movie film, around the same time that Technicolor was aggressively marketing its 3-strip color process for motion pictures. As the economy and the nation’s spirit faltered, there was a deep need and a growing market for bright, colorful pictures. By 1936, Kodachrome’s vivid color palette was made available in a 8mm movie film format for amateur film makers and in the 35mm slide format that—by mid-century, when fortunes and moods were rising once again—encouraged snapshooters to create and star in slideshows about their everyday lives. Kodachrome color was unique and beloved because it captured and intensified life. It spawned a love song (Paul Simon’s 1973 hit, Kodachrome) and a park in Utah (Kodachrome Basin State Park) was named after it. But, Kodachrome was a complex product to manufacture and process. And as consumer taste shifted toward hand-sized prints and instant photography, and once digital photography was introduced and widely marketed, Kodachrome sales tanked.

And now it’s gone. We’ll miss it, because while Kodachrome’s demise doesn’t mean that all the color’s been drained from our lives and pictures, if we want "those nice bright colors" and the "greens of summers" that Paul Simon sang about we’ll have to make them for ourselves by fiddling with software on our laptops and desktops. R.I.P photo magic. And one more thing to add to our "To-Do" lists . . .

Categories: What Gets Saved
Tags: Photo History, Film/Video
Comments: View 6 comments, or Give us yours!
All comments are moderated and subject to approval. Further information is available in The Bigger Picture’s Commenting Guidelines.

Comments (6) – Leave a comment

John Davis

That's a pretty sad story. I still wonder if all Kodachrome will be gone. I guess as well as 35mm there will be 9mm movie film as well. This is a bummer but someone some day will capture this market and hopefully restore film to photographers who like to use film still.

John Davis June 30, 2009 at 5:37 pm
  • reply
Anne Van Camp

Another obsolete format for archivists and conservators to be concerned. I believe the press releases stated that there is only one remaining place to get this kind of film developed.

Anne Van Camp July 1, 2009 at 1:56 pm
  • reply
Marvin Heiferman

Here's the link to an article about Kansas-based Dwayne's Photos, the last lab in the world to process Kodachrome. It explains why Kodachrome color, archivally speaking, is so stable, and how the market (and vendors able to process the material) have vanished.

Marvin Heiferman July 2, 2009 at 9:39 am
  • reply
Christin Boggs, Smithsonian Photography Initiative

After several years of shooting primarily digital and occasionally large format film, I felt inspired this weekend to dust off the old Pentax SLR and expose a 35mm roll of film. After finishing and winding up the roll, I hesitated about where to take it for processing, worried that in my break from 35mm film, 1-hour film services had gone the way of Kodachrome. I stopped into a Walgreens and was relieved to see that indeed, film can still be dropped off and developed in under 60 minutes. But I wonder how long it'll be before drug store photo labs switch totally to digital.

Christin Boggs, Smithsonian Photography Initiative July 7, 2009 at 10:05 am
  • reply
Angela Smith

Great post. We are truly in a digital age, but I can't help feeling as if we use some artisticness with the slow decline of film.

Angela Smith January 3, 2010 at 7:40 pm
  • reply
Marguerita Vakas

Many thanks for discussing such an topical article with all of us. I’ve bookmarked your blog will come back for a re-read again. Keep up the very good work.

Marguerita Vakas March 2, 2010 at 6:40 am
  • reply

Leave a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Produced by the Smithsonian Institution Archives. For copyright questions, please see the Terms of Use.

Stay in touch!

Facebook Twitter Flickr YouTube SlideShare
Join our eNewsletter

About

Connecting you to America’s past with a behind-the-scenes exploration of the Smithsonian’s history, treasures, and the challenges that Archives face preserving collections. More details...

Smithsonian on Flickr Commons

Topics/Tags

  • See Here (612)
  • American History (544)
  • Science (431)
  • Archive (332)
  • Cities/Places (279)
  • Exhibitions (235)
  • Web/Tech (211)
  • Photo History (189)
  • Link Love (154)
  • Politics/Government (153)

Blog Roll

All Smithsonian blogs
American Historical Association Blog
American Institute of Conservation Blog
Archives Next
Archives of American Art
Around the Mall
Field Book Project
Hanging Together
Library of Congress Blogs
National Archives (US) Blogs
National Museum of American History, O say can you see?
Smithsonian Collections Blog
Smithsonian Libraries
Teaching American History

Categories

  • Collections in Focus (991)
  • What Gets Saved (338)
  • Behind the Scenes (212)
  • Smithsonian History (136)

Recent Posts

  • See Here: 5/24/2013
  • Link Love: 5/24/2013
  • "If you feed them, they will come."
  • Women in Science Wednesday: Mary Alice McWhinnie
  • Twenty-Six and Blooming!

Monthly Archive

  • May 2013 (26)
  • April 2013 (26)
  • March 2013 (26)
  • February 2013 (26)
  • January 2013 (28)
  • December 2012 (26)
  • November 2012 (28)
  • October 2012 (32)
  • September 2012 (26)
  • August 2012 (31)
  • July 2012 (26)
  • June 2012 (27)
  • May 2012 (27)
  • April 2012 (27)
  • March 2012 (28)
  • February 2012 (27)
  • January 2012 (26)
  • December 2011 (31)
  • November 2011 (28)
  • October 2011 (35)
  • September 2011 (31)
  • August 2011 (35)
  • July 2011 (41)
  • June 2011 (43)
  • May 2011 (33)
  • April 2011 (40)
  • March 2011 (43)
  • February 2011 (35)
  • January 2011 (36)
  • December 2010 (42)
  • November 2010 (40)
  • October 2010 (44)
  • September 2010 (37)
  • August 2010 (39)
  • July 2010 (38)
  • June 2010 (37)
  • May 2010 (42)
  • April 2010 (44)
  • March 2010 (47)
  • February 2010 (40)
  • January 2010 (39)
  • December 2009 (43)
  • November 2009 (34)
  • October 2009 (11)
  • September 2009 (11)
  • August 2009 (12)
  • July 2009 (14)
  • June 2009 (10)
  • May 2009 (12)
  • April 2009 (14)
  • March 2009 (10)
  • January 2009 (1)
Smithsonian Institution Archives
eNewsletter Facebook Twitter Flickr Historypin YouTube SlideShare Browsealoud
Smithsonian Institution
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Contact