Smithsonian Institution Archives
  • Collections
  • Services
  • Smithsonian History
  • About
  • Education
  • Blog
  • Forums
  • Press
  • Audiences
  • Donate

The Bigger Picture: Visual Archives and the Smithsonian

The Challenge of Preserving Digital Architectural Drawings

by Jessica Scott on July 27, 2010

Construction of the National Museum of the American Indian, July 2003, digital photograph, Smithsonian Institution Archives, Accession 06-012, Box 24, Folder NMAI Construction-July 2003, Folder CD_1, # U.jpg.] At the Archives, we’ve recently begun working with some digital files of architectural drawings that were made for various exhibits and building projects over the past few decades. Some of the ones I have personally been working on include architectural drawings and construction plans for the National Museum of the American Indian. The original files were created in 2003; SIA received them in 2006, and we’re just beginning to tackle the problem of how best to preserve them. Because of the amount of time that has elapsed since the files were created, and the range of computer aided design (or CAD) programs that exist to create files like these, preserving them turns out to be quite a challenge. Complicating things even more, we are not just dealing with conventional architectural drawings of floor layout plans, but also with more specialized types of drawings, for example, for printed circuit board files that I’ve recently learned are known as Gerber files. (Oh, the things you learn as an archivist! Little did I know I’d be rubbing elbows with electrical engineers on online forums in order to figure this out!) A typical 2D CAD drawing -- this one portrays an aerial view of the plan for the National Museum of the American Indian, July 2003, CAD Drawing, Smithsonian Institution Archives, Accession 06-012, Box 24, Folder NMAI Construction-July 2003, Folder CD_2, SCND-RCP-E-R14-REVIEWED-r1.dwg. Though it’s not entirely obvious, there are many reasons to keep architectural files of projects that have been completed. It is necessary to keep a record of the structure, design, and details of a building in case someone (such as an architect or engineer) ever needs to refer to it in the future. Another reason, which is often the case with exhibits, is that the actual built project may no longer exist, so the drawings may be the only record of the event. Preliminary drawing of the entrance and the Rotunda of the new United States National Museum building, now the National Museum of Natural History, 1903, by Unidentified creator, Architectural drawing, Smithsonian Institution Archives, Record Unit 95 Box 38 Folder 12, Negative Number: 18928. Back in pre-digital days, when architectural drawings were drawn on paper, originals could easily be stored in an archive by simply rolling them up or placing them in a flat file drawer. Although digital technology and computer-aided design have radically transformed the practice of architecture, they also raise interesting challenges for archivists charged with preserving building documents for the future. Being able to access these digital files depends on what file format they exist as, whether currently available software still supports them, and making sure that information in the files properly translates when it’s converted into to another format. Usually our best strategy is to convert these kinds of files—which can be proprietary and in a closed format, meaning they sometimes can be opened only by the program that created them—to a non-proprietary or open format that can be opened on different software systems and even different operating systems. Using formats that are accessible through different programs, as well as choosing file formats that are widely used in the digital community as a whole (such as TIFF for images, and PDF for text documents and some CAD files), can help to ensure that the files will last much longer in digital form than if we left them in their original proprietary software, simply because more people will be able to access the files using basic programs that are already on their computers. For these types of unique files, as well as other specialized digital file formats, methods of conversion and preservation are slowly evolving. The goal, as time goes by, is to keep developing new preservation strategies to insure that these files remain available to Smithsonian employees and the public alike in the future. That mission will never truly be over as long as technology and file formats keep evolving and changing. But, of course, that’s what makes it is such an interesting and exciting time to be working in an archive, right now!

Jessica Scott is an Electronic Records Intern at the Smithsonian Institution Archives.

Categories: What Gets Saved
Tags: Web/Tech, Architecture, Archive, Digitization
Comments: View 6 comments, or Give us yours!
All comments are moderated and subject to approval. Further information is available in The Bigger Picture’s Commenting Guidelines.

Comments (6) – Leave a comment

Fred Grevin

Jessica, you may want to consider some combination of digital and analog media for preserving these records. In addition, you should use PDF/E (E = Engineering) when employing that format. ISO Technical Committee TC 171 is moving the PDF/E variant towards better preservation requirements (i.e., more like PDF/A). For the data sets, you may want to look at ISO 10303. Good luck, and Best regards. Fred Grevin

Fred Grevin July 27, 2010 at 2:05 pm
  • reply
Lynda Schmitz Fuhrig

Hi Fred, Thanks. We are researching and trying to use PDF/E. There have been some software challenges with the files we are preserving. Lynda Schmitz Fuhrig SI Archives

Lynda Schmitz Fuhrig July 28, 2010 at 11:12 am
  • reply
OSB

Interesting, I never thought of this issue when it comes to digital graphics. But in a sense I have lost quite few useful documents and photos that are sitting on disks (that probably don't work anymore) because they were stored using old computers (Amiga) that I cannot restore into a different format now without going out of my way, and perhaps in another 10 years this would be impossible. I wonder if in a 20 years current popular format will also be obsolete, Gif is pretty much disappearing, Tiff was resurrected with new BigTiff format. Like Fred mentioned, PDF/E is a good option, you might also want to look into different vector formats since converting to pixel format means a loss of information that were stored in the original files.

OSB July 29, 2010 at 11:12 pm
  • reply
Jessica Scott

Some other neutral formats we have considered for preservation purposes include vector-based graphics, such as IGES and STEP. At some point down the road we may even consider making copies of the files in these formats as well (we always retain the original, in case in the future we want to convert it to a different preservation format.) In the Archives our main purpose is to preserve as much information as possible in a neutral and widely-used format, although at times not all the information can be preserved, as is the case with PDF. Despite that, the extreme popularity and usage of PDF led to our final decision to use it instead of one of the CAD-specific formats. The decision-making is rarely an easy one!

Jessica Scott August 2, 2010 at 9:05 am
  • reply
Peter C. Amsden

This may seem to obvious, but since formats are constantly changing and becoming redundant, it seems to me that, when possible, paper documentation should be made from the digital files. I know that they take up space, but at least they will still be there for many years to come.

Peter C. Amsden August 6, 2010 at 2:10 am
  • reply
Jessica Scott

Hi Peter, There are of course trade-offs when it comes to preserving digital files, and the money and space required to create and maintain paper copies of every digital document we possess is one of them, given the financial and physical limitations we have. The ease of creation of digital documents has led to an explosion of the number of digital documents that exist, compared to when business was conducted strictly in the paper world. There are simply too many digital documents out there to be able to print them all. In addition, a particular issue with CAD digital files is that they often, especially today, contain 3D content. The ability to rotate a model, or perhaps block part of it out to reveal certain interior sections of a project, has made working in the industry all the more easier. Since there is no way all that information could be contained on an architectural drawing on paper, preserving CAD files has been a particular challenge for archivists.

Jessica Scott August 10, 2010 at 9:07 am
  • reply

Leave a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Produced by the Smithsonian Institution Archives. For copyright questions, please see the Terms of Use.

Stay in touch!

Facebook Twitter Flickr YouTube SlideShare
Join our eNewsletter

About

Connecting you to America’s past with a behind-the-scenes exploration of the Smithsonian’s history, treasures, and the challenges that Archives face preserving collections. More details...

Smithsonian on Flickr Commons

Topics/Tags

  • See Here (612)
  • American History (544)
  • Science (431)
  • Archive (332)
  • Cities/Places (279)
  • Exhibitions (235)
  • Web/Tech (211)
  • Photo History (189)
  • Link Love (154)
  • Politics/Government (153)

Blog Roll

All Smithsonian blogs
American Historical Association Blog
American Institute of Conservation Blog
Archives Next
Archives of American Art
Around the Mall
Field Book Project
Hanging Together
Library of Congress Blogs
National Archives (US) Blogs
National Museum of American History, O say can you see?
Smithsonian Collections Blog
Smithsonian Libraries
Teaching American History

Categories

  • Collections in Focus (991)
  • What Gets Saved (338)
  • Behind the Scenes (212)
  • Smithsonian History (136)

Recent Posts

  • See Here: 5/24/2013
  • Link Love: 5/24/2013
  • "If you feed them, they will come."
  • Women in Science Wednesday: Mary Alice McWhinnie
  • Twenty-Six and Blooming!

Monthly Archive

  • May 2013 (26)
  • April 2013 (26)
  • March 2013 (26)
  • February 2013 (26)
  • January 2013 (28)
  • December 2012 (26)
  • November 2012 (28)
  • October 2012 (32)
  • September 2012 (26)
  • August 2012 (31)
  • July 2012 (26)
  • June 2012 (27)
  • May 2012 (27)
  • April 2012 (27)
  • March 2012 (28)
  • February 2012 (27)
  • January 2012 (26)
  • December 2011 (31)
  • November 2011 (28)
  • October 2011 (35)
  • September 2011 (31)
  • August 2011 (35)
  • July 2011 (41)
  • June 2011 (43)
  • May 2011 (33)
  • April 2011 (40)
  • March 2011 (43)
  • February 2011 (35)
  • January 2011 (36)
  • December 2010 (42)
  • November 2010 (40)
  • October 2010 (44)
  • September 2010 (37)
  • August 2010 (39)
  • July 2010 (38)
  • June 2010 (37)
  • May 2010 (42)
  • April 2010 (44)
  • March 2010 (47)
  • February 2010 (40)
  • January 2010 (39)
  • December 2009 (43)
  • November 2009 (34)
  • October 2009 (11)
  • September 2009 (11)
  • August 2009 (12)
  • July 2009 (14)
  • June 2009 (10)
  • May 2009 (12)
  • April 2009 (14)
  • March 2009 (10)
  • January 2009 (1)
Smithsonian Institution Archives
eNewsletter Facebook Twitter Flickr Historypin YouTube SlideShare Browsealoud
Smithsonian Institution
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Contact