The Bigger Picture: Visual Archives and the Smithsonian
Can We Just Forget It?
An interesting story surfaced about a week ago, concerning an over-eager defense lawyer anxiously seeking to expunge not only governmental, but media archives, too, of potentially damaging information or previously published articles about a number of his clients.
As reported in an Associated Press story, it’s common practice that if criminal charges against an individual are dismissed, withdrawn or are no longer applicable (because, for example, a first-time offender has completed a rehabilitation program), all mention of those charges are deleted from public records and archives, clearing that person’s name and record. But Joseph Amendola, a zealous defense lawyer in State College, Pennsylvania, made news when he tried to take legal steps to get two local newspapers—The Centre Daily Times and The Daily Collegian, a student newspaper at Penn State University—to do the same.
Amendola’s claim was that the media’s First Amendment free speech rights shouldn’t trump his clients’ rights to have their names cleared. "What's the sense,” he argued, “in having your record expunged if anyone can Google you and it comes up." But local judges quickly disagreed, pointing out that newspaper articles are generally considered protected speech. But that fact doesn’t seem to be stopping private citizens who, in rising numbers, are asking that archived media stories be taken down, for fear that someone (current or potential future employers, for example) might find damaging information about them on the Internet.
Newspapers, however, are under no legal obligation to change information in their archives if they are factually correct. As Melissa Bevan Melewsky, a media law attorney for the Pennsylvania Newspaper Association noted, an expungement of court records doesn't mean the events in question never occurred. Robert D. Richards—professor of First Amendment studies at Penn State—put it even more succinctly in another online piece about the case: "You cannot ask a news organization to go back and erase history."
But that doesn’t that some people won’t keep on trying to do just that.
Leave a comment
Produced by the Smithsonian Institution Archives. For copyright questions, please see the Terms of Use.
About
Smithsonian on Flickr Commons
Topics/Tags
- See Here (611)
- American History (542)
- Science (430)
- Archive (330)
- Cities/Places (278)
- Exhibitions (234)
- Web/Tech (210)
- Photo History (189)
- Link Love (153)
- Politics/Government (153)
Blog Roll
Categories
- Collections in Focus (990)
- What Gets Saved (337)
- Behind the Scenes (212)
- Smithsonian History (135)
Monthly Archive
- May 2013 (23)
- April 2013 (26)
- March 2013 (26)
- February 2013 (26)
- January 2013 (28)
- December 2012 (26)
- November 2012 (28)
- October 2012 (32)
- September 2012 (26)
- August 2012 (31)
- July 2012 (26)
- June 2012 (27)
- May 2012 (27)
- April 2012 (27)
- March 2012 (28)
- February 2012 (27)
- January 2012 (26)
- December 2011 (31)
- November 2011 (28)
- October 2011 (35)
- September 2011 (31)
- August 2011 (35)
- July 2011 (41)
- June 2011 (43)
- May 2011 (33)
- April 2011 (40)
- March 2011 (43)
- February 2011 (35)
- January 2011 (36)
- December 2010 (42)
- November 2010 (40)
- October 2010 (44)
- September 2010 (37)
- August 2010 (39)
- July 2010 (38)
- June 2010 (37)
- May 2010 (42)
- April 2010 (44)
- March 2010 (47)
- February 2010 (40)
- January 2010 (39)
- December 2009 (43)
- November 2009 (34)
- October 2009 (11)
- September 2009 (11)
- August 2009 (12)
- July 2009 (14)
- June 2009 (10)
- May 2009 (12)
- April 2009 (14)
- March 2009 (10)
- January 2009 (1)

